Heavy increase in spam influx this week?
Mike Kercher
mike at vesol.com
Mon Sep 3 05:12:11 IST 2007
Glad to help! :)
________________________________
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Vlad
Mazek
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 9:39 PM
To: MailScanner discussion
Subject: Re: Heavy increase in spam influx this week?
Aaah. So reading TFM helps :)
Thanks Mike, that did it.
-Vlad
On 9/2/07, Mike Kercher <mike at vesol.com > wrote:
http://technoids.org/dossed.html
<http://technoids.org/dossed.html>
________________________________
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
<mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info> ] On Behalf Of Vlad
Mazek
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 5:06 PM
To: MailScanner discussion
Subject: Re: Heavy increase in spam influx this
week?
How do you manage concurrent connections in
Sendmail? I know
about confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE and WINDOW_SIZE but
is there
anything that will limit the number of concurrent
connections from a
single IP address?
-Vlad
On 8/31/07, Gareth
<list-mailscanner at linguaphone.com> wrote:
cat /var/log/maillog | grep -E
"(connection
count|concurrency)"
Looking through my logs there have been
the odd one or
two IP addresses in
the past with about 10 active
connections at once but
starting from the 27th
I started to see connection of over 20
concurrent.
I have dropped the concurrent
connections per IP from 50
down to 5. We only
have a 1Mbps internet connection so if
any genuine
person tries to send us
more than that at the same time I would
prefer to limit
it to conserve
bandwidth anyway.
I think I'll do what you did and reduce
the
smptd_timeout aswell.
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
<mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info>
>
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
<mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info> ]On
Behalf Of Leland
> J. Steinke
> Sent: 31 August 2007 18:55
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Heavy increase in spam
influx this week?
>
>
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> > My Postfix machines still suffer
from the backlog of
bots, as I
> haven't checked yet
> > if Postfix provides similar time-out
options. Anyone
knows?
>
> smtpd_timeout?
>
> I started reducing this from 300s to
120s several
moments ago, after
> catching up on my email after a
particularly long
meeting discussing,
> among other things, requirements for
new spam/virus
filtering servers...
>
>
> Leland
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy
the book off the
website!
>
>
>
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
<http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner>
Before posting, read
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
Support MailScanner development - buy
the book off the
website!
--
-Vlad
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
Before posting, read
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the
website!
--
-Vlad
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list