Heavy increase in spam influx this week?
Vlad Mazek
v at vladville.com
Mon Sep 3 03:39:24 IST 2007
Aaah. So reading TFM helps :)
Thanks Mike, that did it.
-Vlad
On 9/2/07, Mike Kercher <mike at vesol.com> wrote:
>
> http://technoids.org/dossed.html
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Vlad
> Mazek
> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 5:06 PM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Heavy increase in spam influx this week?
>
>
> How do you manage concurrent connections in Sendmail? I know
> about confCONNECTION_RATE_THROTTLE and WINDOW_SIZE but is there
> anything that will limit the number of concurrent connections from a
> single IP address?
>
> -Vlad
>
>
> On 8/31/07, Gareth <list-mailscanner at linguaphone.com> wrote:
>
> cat /var/log/maillog | grep -E "(connection
> count|concurrency)"
> Looking through my logs there have been the odd one or
> two IP addresses in
> the past with about 10 active connections at once but
> starting from the 27th
> I started to see connection of over 20 concurrent.
>
> I have dropped the concurrent connections per IP from 50
> down to 5. We only
> have a 1Mbps internet connection so if any genuine
> person tries to send us
> more than that at the same time I would prefer to limit
> it to conserve
> bandwidth anyway.
>
> I think I'll do what you did and reduce the
> smptd_timeout aswell.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info>
> > [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info]On
> Behalf Of Leland
> > J. Steinke
> > Sent: 31 August 2007 18:55
> > To: MailScanner discussion
> > Subject: Re: Heavy increase in spam influx this week?
> >
> >
> > Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> >
> > > My Postfix machines still suffer from the backlog of
> bots, as I
> > haven't checked yet
> > > if Postfix provides similar time-out options. Anyone
> knows?
> >
> > smtpd_timeout?
> >
> > I started reducing this from 300s to 120s several
> moments ago, after
> > catching up on my email after a particularly long
> meeting discussing,
> > among other things, requirements for new spam/virus
> filtering servers...
> >
> >
> > Leland
> > --
> > MailScanner mailing list
> > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> >
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> >
> > Before posting, read
> http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> >
> > Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the
> website!
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read
> http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the
> website!
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -Vlad
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
--
-Vlad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20070902/31ac25e6/attachment-0001.html
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list