OT: MS Exchange backups
Denis Beauchemin
Denis.Beauchemin at USherbrooke.ca
Sat Nov 24 17:49:43 GMT 2007
Ugo Bellavance a écrit :
> Denis Beauchemin wrote:
>> Gerry Doris a écrit :
>>> shuttlebox wrote:
>>>> On Nov 23, 2007 10:04 PM, Denis Beauchemin
>>>> <Denis.Beauchemin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Manager (TSM) and Backup Exec but couldn't backup our 250GB data
>>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure I understand your question... it takes 48 hours to
>>>>> backup
>>>>> to disk!
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, we can't afford to stop Exchange to either backup or
>>>>> restore
>>>>> data. Everything has to be done online...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Something is very wrong. We use Legato Networker on Solaris and it
>>>> backs up many TB during the night including at least six Exchange
>>>> servers each with larger databases than yours. Of course we spread the
>>>> full backups so most servers only gets a diff or inc backup but still
>>>> the full backups never takes more than a few hours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> We generally install either Legato or Veritas and backup many
>>> Exchange servers/TBs overnight. Check to make sure that the servers
>>> are being kicked off at different times...don't try and start
>>> everyone at midnight! 250GB is nothing.
>> I agree with all of you. It should not take so much time... disks
>> are on a local raid5 box. I think the time is spent extracting
>> people's mailboxes from the db and copying them to disk... but
>> still, it takes way too long...
>
> You should check the queue length on all your disks when you start the
> backup. How is this RAID5 array connected to the exchange server? On
> the same controller as the rest of the disks? Are they on the same
> disk? If you have a dual NIC on this server, you can have a separate
> box connected with a crossovercable, running 2X 500 GB (or more) HDD
> in a RAID 1 config. You'll have better write speed this way, or with
> a RAID10. What I mean is that your bottleneck is maybe the reads on
> the live filesystem, maybe the write on the backup media.
>
>>
>> How do you restore a single mailbox or some emails?
>
> Using Backup Exec, with brick-level backups.
>
>> Do you have to restore the hole db and then extract the relevant
>> emails? If so, it is a waste of time and resources... unless there
>> isn't any other way... I think this is what they are trying to avoid
>> but obviously it is not working very well...
>
Thanks Ugo,
I will check with the admin on Monday. The backup is probably done on
the same array as the db is on, which is not good...
I don't know much about Exchange but there are serious talks about
switching its support to my team... which makes me uncomfortable... we
are managing the Cyrus users but they want to deploy Exchange for staff
members...
So with brick-level backups how do you restore a single mailbox?
Thanks!
Denis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3595 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20071124/0c69de7f/smime.bin
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list