Minimum hardware capacity for 35k e-mail scans/day

Drew Marshall drew.marshall at technologytiger.net
Sat Nov 17 00:18:19 GMT 2007


On Fri, November 16, 2007 23:51, Scott Silva wrote:
>> Thanks for that... sounds like a tough policy to maintain.
>>
>> G
> It shouldn't be that bad, if done right, as most consumer dsl and cable
> connection shouldn't be directly sending mail anyway. They "should" be using
> the providers smarthosts.

Quite. While I don't block these directly, I am much more aggressive with
checking the sender's details etc. It is also worth noting that the zen.spamhaus
list (From the PBL list) also contains IP ranges of ISP customer's IP addresses
that shouldn't be sending mail directly (As submitted by the ISP's) see here
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/index.lasso

This makes it rather easier to be more strict with the client connections.

Drew


--
In line with our policy, this message has been scanned
for viruses and dangerous content by Technology Tiger in association with Mail Launder.
Further information can be found at www.technologytiger.net/policy

Technology Tiger Limited is registered in Scotland with registration number: 310997
Registered Office 55-57 West High Street Inverurie AB51 3QQ




More information about the MailScanner mailing list