Minimum hardware capacity for 35k e-mail scans/day
gmatt at nerc.ac.uk
Thu Nov 15 10:52:56 GMT 2007
Edward Prendergast wrote:
> Any advice from the vast pool of MailScanner experience would be greatly
- reject more at the MTA - consider a block list
- double the memory to 4GB - it will get used and its much faster than disk.
- run a caching name service daemon - high load may be due to iowait.
Also, consider reducing the number of DNS lookups performed by SA.
- check to see if you are running pyzor and try removing it - more long
DNS queries to drive up the load.
- remove IMAP services - this can really kill a busy server, separate
out your mail filtering from your mail delivery
Your dual Xeons should be able to handle that level of mail. That said,
I have a client that runs a busy IMAP server alongside MS on a much more
powerful box and I had to impose limits on the imap connections as
certain clients were killing the performance when churning through large
Are you queues actually building up or are you just concerned with the
Greg Matthews 01491 692445
Head of UNIX/Linux, iTSS Wallingford
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
More information about the MailScanner