No Logging to Syslog: MailScanner 4.65.3-1 on Solaris 9
Mr jeremy pennington
jeremypennington at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 13 02:15:00 GMT 2007
----- Original Message ----
From: shuttlebox <shuttlebox at gmail.com>
To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:18:17 AM
Subject: Re: No Logging to Syslog: MailScanner 4.65.3-1 on Solaris 9
On Nov 12, 2007 3:09 AM, Mr jeremy pennington
<jeremypennington at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I upgraded to MailScanner 4.65.3-1 last night and since then MailScanner has not logged any messages to syslog. MailWatch shows messages are being processed as normal and I have verified they are. So I tried copying log.pm from the prior version installed (which was 4.54.6) to the new version and restarting MailScanner. This time the standard start up messages were recorded to syslog, but no messages were logged about mail being processed, in fact this disabled mail from being processed (it just stayed in the queue). So I reverted back and everything seems to be working again, except no logs from MailScanner are appearing in syslog. Any thoughts?
Look in Log.pm for "setlogsock" and compare the differences between
the working version and the new. My guess is that the socket type has
changed. You will also find the same settings in the autoupdate
scripts for the virus scanners.
Also make sure that the syslog daemon listens to remote connections.
# netstat -a | grep syslog
*.syslog Idle
As a Solaris user you might find it handy to check out the Blastwave
collection of software, I package MailScanner and it automagically
solves all dependencies for you. Clam, SpamAssassin and so on is also
available.
http://www.blastwave.org/
--
/peter
--
Thanks Peter!
Running netstat gives me the following:
# netstat -a | grep syslog
mail.32791 mail.syslog Connected
mail.43133 mail.syslog Connected
localhost.60230 localhost.syslog Connected
localhost.60231 localhost.syslog Connected
localhost.60258 localhost.syslog Connected
localhost.60260 localhost.syslog Connected
Comparing the the two Log.pm, there is some differences for "setlogsock". I tried several different changes, but was not able to get anything to work. Any other thoughts?
Thanks for the info on blastware, I'll take a look at it.
Jeremy
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list