Postfix vs MailScanner : Slow Incoming Queue

Glenn Steen glenn.steen at gmail.com
Sat Nov 10 10:48:25 GMT 2007


On 10/11/2007, Drew Marshall <drew.marshall at technologytiger.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Nov 2007, at 22:50, R Wahyudi wrote:
> I did  ..
> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2007-11/0364.html
>
> Anyway .. I am still curious to know if this is the default MailScanner -
> postfix behavior ie : you have to wait for
> qmgr to respawn to be able to deliver message from incoming queue ??
> Evening all, been far too long since I have posted (Been stupidly busy :-( )
>
> I would suggest you want to check your Delivery method option at the bottom
> MailScanner.conf and make sure it is batch and not queue. Setting it to
> queue would invoke this behaviour. Changing the queue runner settings should
> not be required. The queue running is called by Postfix when each process
> finishes to advise the next to run. The 300 second delay is merely to catch
> anything that 'got left behind'.
>
> Drew
The word of reason returnes!
Glad to see you Drew!

Cheers
-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se


More information about the MailScanner mailing list