PF2.4 support - was Re: feature request: compress attachments

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri May 25 14:55:15 IST 2007



Glenn Steen wrote:
> On 24/05/07, Glenn Steen <glenn.steen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 24/05/07, Julian Field <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Glen,
>> >
>> > My brain is not well enough to get my head round this stuff. It's all
>> > washing in through my eyes and straight out of my ears unfortunately.
>> >
>> > Is there any chance you could find time to implement the 2.4 
>> support as
>> > you say you already have an idea how to do it anyway please?
>> >
>> > Once you're convinced it works, I'll then just adopt your patches.
>> >
>> > Sorry, I'm just not up to doing this myself, but would very much 
>> like to
>> > get full PF support in as soon as possible.
>> >
>> > If you can generate a few test messages for me, I'll then test your 
>> code
>> > and hopefully start to gain a bit of insight into how it works.
>> >
>> > Many thanks,
>> > Jules.
>>
>> I'll see what I can do... The problem is testing it all... Very 
>> timeconsuming.
>> I found the first draft for 2.4 support, but ... it needs testing...
>> I'll see what I can do, perhaps this weekend.
>>
>
> Ok, found some time right now... I've tested this mainly with
> handcrafted queue files, and in my production (which does not use a
> body editing/replacing milter...), without any discernible bad effect.
> There is a price though, since we exchange a nice/fast seek with a
> semi-convoluted loop.
>
> The code is ugly, and could well bear with some constructive
> critisism... and if some sharp (postmix-friendly:-) minds like Dhawal,
> Drew, Joshua, Phil (Uxbod) or Gerhard could find some time to
> test/read/verify both the thinking and code, that would be much
> appreciated. Even some non-postfix-liking minds would be very much
> appreciated (That means you, oh evil bunny;-).
> It should be good enough for a beta:-). So if you feel up to it, and
> don't think it too massive a thing Jules...:-)
That's just what I wanted, many thanks.
I'll put out a beta in a bit with this in it.
I assume this patch includes your previous patch, and is directly 
applicable to the main MailScanner source.

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk



More information about the MailScanner mailing list