IP address reputation, BorderWare
Rick Chadderdon
mailscanner at yeticomputers.com
Fri Mar 23 17:22:26 CET 2007
Chris Yuzik wrote:
> Rick Chadderdon wrote:
>> If you get a
>> dictionary spam flood from someone forging one of my domains, I get a
>> connection flood from you while your system tries to validate those
>> thousands of bogus addresses. Uncool and unwelcome.
> Rick,
>
> I see your point. Perhaps it depends on the order with which these
> checks happen.
>
> My understanding is that our servers don't do SAV unless the inbound
> message is for a real recipient (or alias). We prohibit the use of a
> "catch-all" alias, so a dictionary attack on our server won't really
> have much effect on you. Or am I wrong (we use SMF-SAV with Sendmail)?
> If I'm wrong, and the milter initiates a verification even before
> checking to see if a recipient exists, then I may have to re-evaluate
> our stance.
>
> What do you think?
I certainly appreciate the effort to minimize the impact of SAV on
others. I am, however, somewhat of an absolutist when it comes to
certain issues, and I don't like my resources used without my consent,
in a way not required by the act of offering a given kind of resource to
the world. Now, I suppose it all really boils down to the question of
what "normal" use is. I'd probably not have a problem with SAV at all
if it was part of the *standard* for email communications. Then it
would just be something one had to deal with, and those verification
floods would be just another thing to deal with - and blame on the bad
guys. But it's not. Maybe it should be.
If Matt makes the changes he spoke of, I'd be a lot less grumpy about
the use of this milter. Still, if a large provider using SAV were
dictionary-spammed with a joe-job of one of my users, I'd be sharing
their pain, quite unwillingly, simply because of the number of valid
addresses they'd hit. I *have* had days where my logs were so full of
SAV junk that working with them was made far more painful than it needed
to be.
I also don't like the fact that my logs are full of portscans, but those
guys don't step out where I can tell 'em how I feel. :)
Rick
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list