What MTA ...

[am.lists]

On 3/12/07, Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> wrote:
> Mikael Syska spake the following on 3/12/2007 12:40 PM:
> > Hi,
> >
> > First off ... I dont want to start a flamewar of any kind here .....
> > please.
> >
> > I have used Postfix for about a year and its fairly easy to use, used it
> > with VDA ... and multiple domains ... so I wanted to try a new MTA.
> >
> > One of the 3 others ...
> >
> > So my question is ... what works best with MS? since Postfix got some
> > issues with MS ( not that it have any effect, after what I have read ) I
> > still wants to try a new ... maybe I will like Postfix best after I have
> > tried the other, you'll never know....
> >
> > // ouT
> >
> >
> Mailscanner was originally designed on sendmail, but it seems that all are
> fairly equal as to the support they get. All but qmail, which you will have to
> go to openprotect to get a mailscanner that is patched to work with qmail.
>
> I am thinking of playing with alternate MTA's also, but just so I have a
> better background with design and support. Every MTA has its pluses and
> minuses, you should pick a MTA on its own merits, as mailscanner works
> basically the same on all of them.
>

Has anyone ever tried MS SMTP on Windows with MailScanner running in a
Cygwin environment?

/ducks, runs.