Spam score is negative, yet message is still marked as spam
Gerard Seibert
gerard at seibercom.net
Mon Mar 12 19:12:36 CET 2007
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:10:19 +0530
Dhawal Doshy <dhawal at netmagicsolutions.com> wrote:
> Why 6.2 and not 7.0-CURRENT?? you only need to answer this question
> to yourself.. anyways there was a nice reply by Viktor on the postfix
> list today in reference to postfix versions, which does validate your
> point of view as well but at the same time says 'whatever rocks your
> boat' (as Glenn puts it), i'll paste the URL here for convenience..
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/160371
Yes, I read that post when it appeared on the Postfix forum. As far as
'7.0' goes, I only have three computers at the present that I can mess
with personally. Updating a program is one this; an entire OS is quite
another. Besides, I hope to install '7.0' on another PC I am getting
soon.
> While running the latest/greatest does have its advantages.. if an
> older version does fit the requirements, then there is no urge/reason
> to upgrade.. Finally if your distro (say rhel for instance) backports
> important fixes, all the more reason to not run bleeding-edge and
> stick to distro-stable. For some the thrill lies in latest/greatest,
> for others the thrill is in stability (dealing with the known devil)..
Since I am running FBSD, I am not sure what exactly you are referring
to. I have never ran anything other that this and Windows obviously. I
think FBSD offers a lot more options when it comes to keeping a system
current than some of the other OS's that I have investigated. That is
one of the prime reasons I choose to use it. From what you were
describing in your previous post regarding updating, I am sure of it.
If I had to go through all that just to update a program, I would go
back to Microsoft.
As you stated though, whatever ...
--
Gerard
QOTD:
Money isn't everything, but at least it keeps the kids in touch.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20070312/5f7517ad/signature.bin
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list