RBLs - in MailScanner, SpamAssassin, or right in Sendmail?
Ken
ka at pacific.net
Thu Mar 1 07:26:04 CET 2007
Chris Yuzik wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Putting some final spit and polish on the new server before beginning
> to move users over to it in the next few days.
>
> As I'm editing and tweaking countless lines of .conf files, the
> thought came to me *gasp* that there just might be a better way to do
> things than the way I've always done them.
>
> So. Best practice.
depends on your userbase, you management's thinking on email (that is a
pita)
> RBLs in MailScanner.conf?
not usually....
> Or better in SpamAssassin?
more often this is the recommended way - give them a weight.
> Or better yet in Sendmail.mc? Obviously I want the magical sweet spot
> where I block 100.0000% of spam, with 0.000000% false positives. ;-)
>
Amen. Maybe Zen? Maybe Surbl? I'd say at least SBL. Opinions on this get
religious, so just test in SA and if something hits 100% for YOU, then
put it into something that blocks at sendmail, be it a milter or whatever.
> Furthermore, which RBLs should I use? Others? Not some of these? I was
> considering:
> 1) Spamhaus-Zen?
Absolutely
> 2) Spamcop.net
Yes, in SA
> 3) NJABL
Some parts, I think are in Zen, but yes also in SA
> 4) safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net
dunno.
> Thanks,
> Chris
Just my $.02, from some experience with ~300k emails a day at a rural
ISP. ymmv.
Ken A
Pacific.Net
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list