High ClamScan ...
Rob Poe
rpoe at plattesheriff.org
Mon Jun 11 20:39:08 IST 2007
>From Top
30174 clam 25 0 26352 25M 1100 R 25.9 1.0 0:07 0 clamscan
30142 clam 25 0 27044 26M 1100 R 25.5 1.0 0:19 0 clamscan
30387 clam 25 0 13936 13M 1096 R 21.1 0.5 0:01 0 clamscan
30128 clam 25 0 27488 26M 1100 R 19.9 1.0 0:30 0 clamscan
load average: 6.86, 4.74, 3.31
Centos 3.x, Dual Xeon 2.8 /w 2.5 gigs of ram/HP Proliand DL380G3 /w hardware RAID 1 (SCSI 10k drives)
What gives?
Is there a better way to do this? Seems that clamscan is tooo freaking slow any more..
Another box:
16842 clam 25 0 18260 13m 1204 R 99 0.6 0:29.65 clamscan
17024 clam 25 0 12100 6696 1204 R 92 0.3 0:06.72 clamscan
16884 clam 25 0 19416 12m 1204 R 72 0.6 0:23.79 clamscan
17050 clam 25 0 6808 2276 1044 R 54 0.1 0:01.95 clamscan
load average: 5.01, 3.86, 3.43
Centos 4.x, dual 2.8 xeon, 2g ram, dual SATA on a 3Ware controller
These aren't slow boxes .. but Clam is killing them..
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list