Request for comments 3

[UxBoD]

Steve,

That sheds a different light on the matter then :) Though I do agree that the CustomFunction would be a great addition to MailScanner.

Endless possibilities.

Regards,


--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854  36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod at sip.splatnix.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Freegard" <steve.freegard at fsl.com>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:51:38 AM (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: Request for comments 3

Hi Jules,

Julian Field wrote:
> Would this not be better than having a specific 'use-caution' flag with 
> a definition that I create?

This is a great idea as it offers more than just the ability to set a 
flag, but makes the whole thing extendable via a CustomFunction.

However I'm still mulling over what the original poster wanted to do, as 
everything that has been described so far is already done by MCP (In v2 
of MailWatch - users cannot 'see' MCP messages or release them), so 
having having yet-another-flag for 'caution' is not really necessary 
IMO.  But I'll happily change my mind one I've actually released v2 and 
people can see what it actually does.

Kind regards,
Steve.
-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.