BarricadeMX experiences

[UxBoD]

I ran it for a couple of days on test, and it does do what it says on the tin <UK talk - Jules ;)).

It is a very clever logic engine.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Res" <res at ausics.net>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: 24 July 2007 22:12:26 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: BarricadeMX experiences

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message


On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Richard Lynch wrote:

>
> The graph only shows what made it into the servers.  We're working on a way 
> to include the BarricateMX stats.  Last Friday (before the switchover) the 
> stats were...
>
> Ham: 142,860    Spam: 1,202,240    Infected: 137   Total:  1,345,100
>
> Yesterday it was....
>
> Ham: 160,886  Spam:  45,167   Infected: 32    Total: 206,053


Of course its going to be less if you run somthing else up front.. If I 
ran MIMEDefang on the MTA's,  I'm sure MailScanner would also see very 
little, if any spam or problems.



-- 
Cheers
Res
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGpms6sWhAmSIQh7MRAliYAJ9DG7JQZYNdeNVuZjjHCFEmO+7aeQCfcYcu
o4r+2xzHXom7+fkCgy7VHKg=
=Jnwr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.