Reason for whitelisting?

[am.lists]

On 7/19/07, Matt Kettler <mkettler at evi-inc.com> wrote:
> am.lists wrote:
> > Also, the SARE rule  70_sare_whitelist.cf contains several known-good's
> > too.
>
> This is conclusively *NOT* 70_sare_whitelist.cf, or any other spamassassin-level
> whitelisting. Those would show up as a SpamAssassin rule-hit of USER_IN_WHITELIST.
>
> The "is whitelisted" message means it's whitelisted at the MailScanner level, as
> a part of the MailScannner.conf "Is Definitely Not Spam" mechanism, or some bug
> in, or misuse of, that mechanism.

Good point, you're correct. My bad indeed.

/Angelo