Request for comments

[UxBoD]

True. Go for it then Jules, and we can play :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Kettler" <mkettler at evi-inc.com>
To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:15:36 PM (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: Request for comments

Alex Broens wrote:
> On 7/19/2007 9:16 PM, Steven Andrews wrote:
>> Yes please.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
>> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Julian
>> Field
>> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:42 PM
>> To: MailScanner discussion
>> Subject: Request for comments
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I am wondering if it would help if I added "Subject" to the list of
>> things you could use in rulesets.
>>
>> Would it be useful?
> 
> SA does this nicely, isn't it redundant?
> + you have the meta advantage


No, since when are rulesets in MailScanner in any way redundant with SA?

SA can't do something like:
	quarantine any message with subject text "You've won"
	delete any message with the subject text "postcard"

Sure you can use SA's rule scores to force your "high scoring spam action", but
you can't do *BOTH* of the above actions at the same time.

But MailScanner rulesets can.


-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.