Request for comments

[Matt Kettler]

Alex Broens wrote:
> On 7/19/2007 9:16 PM, Steven Andrews wrote:
>> Yes please.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
>> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Julian
>> Field
>> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:42 PM
>> To: MailScanner discussion
>> Subject: Request for comments
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I am wondering if it would help if I added "Subject" to the list of
>> things you could use in rulesets.
>>
>> Would it be useful?
> 
> SA does this nicely, isn't it redundant?
> + you have the meta advantage


No, since when are rulesets in MailScanner in any way redundant with SA?

SA can't do something like:
	quarantine any message with subject text "You've won"
	delete any message with the subject text "postcard"

Sure you can use SA's rule scores to force your "high scoring spam action", but
you can't do *BOTH* of the above actions at the same time.

But MailScanner rulesets can.