Doubts about PF, what are the pros/cons about other MTAs?

[Scott Silva]

Res spake the following on 7/1/2007 3:41 PM:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
> 
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Mikael Syska wrote:
> 
>> If the above is right, this seems like its using the resources better
>> than amavisd-new maybe, but theese days Ram and harddrives are very
>> cheap, so if it just runs fast, i'm happy.
> 
> I've used many methods, amavisd(-new), sophos, mimedefang, qmailscanner
> and commercial apps, nothing comes close to MailScanners reliability and
> performance (although I've only used sendmail and qmail, any postmix
> server I take over gets quickly replaced by either sendmail or qmail so
> I've never seen the MS/PF issues)
> 
> 
No fair bashing Postfix while Glenn is on vacation!! ;-P

-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!