Doubts about PF, what are the pros/cons about other MTAs?

[Res]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Mikael Syska wrote:

> If the above is right, this seems like its using the resources better than 
> amavisd-new maybe, but theese days Ram and harddrives are very cheap, so if 
> it just runs fast, i'm happy.

I've used many methods, amavisd(-new), sophos, mimedefang, qmailscanner 
and commercial apps, nothing comes close to MailScanners reliability and 
performance (although I've only used sendmail and qmail, any postmix 
server I take over gets quickly replaced by either sendmail or qmail so 
I've never seen the MS/PF issues)


-- 
Cheers
Res
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGiC2UsWhAmSIQh7MRApzoAJ47tJ3PhV1/DwS8YBLqqzrdKKkjMgCePAba
VaLA7cu7ytdenFSx6tfAdvs=
=Vn8A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----