MailScanner vs Borderware

[DAve]

Martin.Hepworth wrote:
> 
> I'd suggest DefenderMX if you want a commercial product, the Borderware
> product is getting really bad chat on the lists over the last few
> months. The spam detection rate has apparently gone down really badly
> over the last year or so..
> 
> MW will do black/white on a per user basis, but obviously you hve to
> split the email to individual recipients first.....
> 

Agreed, splitting the recipients out was key to getting fine grained 
control for us.

DAve

> --
> Martin Hepworth
> Snr Systems Administrator
> Solid State Logic
> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
>> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of shuttlebox
>> Sent: 19 January 2007 17:22
>> To: MailScanner discussion
>> Subject: MailScanner vs Borderware
>>
>> A colleague of mine who's responsible for quite a large MS
>> installation processing mail for a number of our largest clients is
>> considering switching to Borderware instead. I have built his
>> installation and take care of all the more complex work but he's fed
>> up with tinkering with rulesets (typically white/blacklists) for end
>> users.
>>
>> I know that many of you will recommend him to use MailWatch for
>> simplicity but he wants to move configuration to the end users
>> themselves and apparently BW offers that.
>>
>> 1. Does anyone here know pros and cons of BW appliances besides what
>> you can find out by visiting their web site? I have read their
>> material from there.
>> 2. Is there (web) frontends aimed at the end users available for MS?
>> Is DefenderMX the answer?
>>
>> I want more MS, not less so I want to provide what he thinks MS lacks
>> in comparison to the commercial alternatives (who tend to focus on
>> nice GUI:s).
>>
>> --
>> /peter


-- 
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?

Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.