New Year's Resolution and new beta release

[Res]

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, David Lee wrote:

> NOTE: Might the SA/child itself need an enclosing "eval {}"?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> That is, at the least giving a syslog message, and if possible allowing
> processing to be deferred (which, OK, would leave to a buildup in the
> inbound queue).  Or, in that "state" model, a (hopefully!) rare third

You are kidding right?   Deffer processing?
Calculate this... 1700 msgs per minute, by say, every minute overnight
based on midnight to say 7 am, thats over 700,000 messages deferred,
once fixed, 1700 mp/m + backlog,  most customers like their mail within
the same millenium, I know many other MS users who process a damn sight 
more messages per minute then we do.

-- 
Cheers
Res

"So, you think you can tell Heaven from Hell?" - Roger Waters