Do others see this effect in their maillogs?

[Duncan, Brian M.]

OK I can understand that if it was meant to be that way.

For RBL it should then be something like:

to kattenlaw.com is spam(RBL), cbl, MAPS-ALL, zen.spamhaus.org

Otherwise grammatically it does not make sense.

I really just brought this up to see if this was only happening to me.

Thanks


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf
> Of Rick Chadderdon
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 12:50 PM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Do others see this effect in their maillogs?
>
> Duncan, Brian M. wrote:
> > Notice that the word spam is missing in the RBL failure message?
> >
> > Should it not read: to kattenlaw.com is spam, cbl, MAPS-ALL,
> > zen.spamhaus.org
> >
> >
> >
> > I hope that makes it more clear.
> >  
> It is my understanding that the "is spam" designation is to
> distinguish messages that have failed SpamAssassin checks
> from messages that have failed other checks.  If I'm wrong,
> someone please correct me.
>
> Rick
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>

===========================================================
CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
===========================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction.  Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies.
===========================================================
NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
===========================================================