LookOUT 2007

[Mike Kercher]

Sorry for top posting...OWA!
 
I'm running Outlook 2007 on a dual Xeon 3.06Ghz (not HT either) with 4G
of RAM and it still drags arse.
 
Mike
 

________________________________

From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info on behalf of Gerard
Seibert
Sent: Mon 2/12/2007 11:50 AM
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Subject: Re: LookOUT 2007



On Sunday February 11, 2007 at 03:20:04 (PM) Mike Kercher wrote:

> Right click the message itself and select Message Options.  I find
> Outlook 2007 to be MUCH slower than 2003.  I'm am not impressed by
Vista
> or Office 2007 so far.

I just tried Vista with the latest MS Office. It ran quite well. Of
course, you have to have a system with the nuts to handle it. This was
on a Dell with an Intel dual-core (3.8 Ghz I believe) system. Tons of
memory. I would never use it on an outdated single core system with 512
memory.

Just my 2¢.

--
Gerard

"I choose to ignore, of course, the fact that self-Googling
is perhaps the most narcissistic thing a person can do that doesn't
involve actually humping a mirror."

       Dan Kois
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!


-------------- next part --------------
Sorry for top posting...OWA!
 
I'm running Outlook 2007 on a dual Xeon 3.06Ghz (not HT either) with 4G
of RAM and it still drags arse.
 
Mike
 

________________________________

From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info on behalf of Gerard
Seibert
Sent: Mon 2/12/2007 11:50 AM
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Subject: Re: LookOUT 2007



On Sunday February 11, 2007 at 03:20:04 (PM) Mike Kercher wrote:

> Right click the message itself and select Message Options.  I find
> Outlook 2007 to be MUCH slower than 2003.  I'm am not impressed by
Vista
> or Office 2007 so far.

I just tried Vista with the latest MS Office. It ran quite well. Of
course, you have to have a system with the nuts to handle it. This was
on a Dell with an Intel dual-core (3.8 Ghz I believe) system. Tons of
memory. I would never use it on an outdated single core system with 512
memory.

Just my 2¢.

--
Gerard

"I choose to ignore, of course, the fact that self-Googling
is perhaps the most narcissistic thing a person can do that doesn't
involve actually humping a mirror."

       Dan Kois
--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!