Scanning for Spam

[DAve]

am.lists wrote:
>> I also meant to point out that your Bayes was only hitting 50% which add
>> nothing to the score.  Start feeding these emails into the Bayes
>> learning system, and it will start to match these emails.
> 
> So, I guess that's the question.
> 
> Is there a way to make Bayes learn this when it's not currently tagged 
> as spam?

There are many many ways to make that happen depending on your network, 
your policies, your users. We simply keep messages that we feel are spam 
and once a day I ftp the mailbox up to my MS servers and run sa-learn on 
them.

I can run through our Postmaster mailboxes and gleen 50 a day easily (we 
have no spam scanning on postmaster or abuse). A simplistic approach, 
but so far seems to be working. We may have to get serious about it 
farther down the road.

DAve

> 
> PS: I did get the additional SARE rules added to my rdj config. I hope
> the admins over there don't ban me since I've downloaded some files
> than 1x/day today. :-/
> 
> Angelo


-- 
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?

Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.