Scanning for Spam

[DAve]

am.lists wrote:
> On 2/9/07, Anthony Peacock <a.peacock at chime.ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Put an example of these emails somewhere where the list users can find
>> it (web page) with full headers, and I am sure people will tell you what
>> scores the get and which rules hit.
> 
> Anthony:
> 
> I will leave this up for a while for discussion:
> 
> http://mailgw.evokeemail.com/q/20070208.htm

First message scored;
Content analysis details:   (2.3 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
-------------------------------------------------
  0.3 TO_EMPTY               To: is empty
  0.3 RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP        Received: contains illegal IP address
  1.7 SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3   BODY: Last week's hot stock scam
  0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
                             [score: 0.5483]
  0.1 TO_CC_NONE             No To: or Cc: header



Second message scored;
Content analysis details:   (17.3 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
-------------------------------------------------
  0.3 TO_EMPTY               To: is empty
  0.3 RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP        Received: contains illegal IP address
  1.7 SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3   BODY: Last week's hot stock scam
   15 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
  0.1 TO_CC_NONE             No To: or Cc: header

DAve
-- 
Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a
logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos
for other non-international holidays, but nothing for
Veterans?

Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.