CentOS yum repository
Craig White
craigwhite at azapple.com
Sat Dec 8 01:24:57 GMT 2007
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:41 -0800, Mark Nienberg wrote:
> I'm preparing to install MailScanner on a fresh CentOS 5.1 x86_64 machine. I think
> I'll give the experimental yum repo a try. Is it recommended to use the
> yum-priorities plugin and give higher priority (lower numbers) to the Centos-Base
> repos to prevent packages from rpmforge from overwriting the ones that are part of
> the base distribution? Would this, for example, prevent the recent problems some had
> with perl-MailTools?
----
No
Here's the deal as I understand it...
If you install MailScanner, it installs a number of perl packages
including perl-Time-HiRes perl-MailTools etc.
If you add rpmforge/dag repo, it sees that those packages and happily
updates them. This is a good thing.
I don't think priorities would help for perl-MailTools because it wasn't
installed from a repo.
I think that you would benefit from newer packages from rpmforge such as
his spamassassin.
At present, perhaps it is best to just exclude perl-MailTools from
rpmforge/dag until this is all worked out.
Craig
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list