fell off the wagon, climbing back on

[James]

Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
> Julian et al,
>
> I replaced my legacy sendmail box with an fancy new all-in-one
> email appliance on July 23.  Anti-spam, anti-virus, integrated
> webmail/POP/IMAP/calendaring, shared mail folders, etc, etc.
> And I bailed off the list, thinking life would be good.
>
> Forgive me, Jules, for I have sinned.  I've gotten my butt kicked
> by both the spammers and the user community in the past month.
> While my new gear is great for integrated webmail etc (and the
> users like it), its anti-spam setup is clearly inferior to 
> MailScanner. I figured that the [unamed] appliance might be worse than 
> MailScanner in
> terms of anti-spam, but I was shocked at how much of a difference there
> is.
>
> Due to popular demand/angry mobs, I am putting my legacy system
> back in front of the appliance to run sendmail/MailScanner in relay 
> mode to get our spam back to where it was.  I had left it
> intact, so this was just a case of updating MailScanner, SA, and clam
> and redoing my sendmail.cf file.
>
> Woe to those who stray from the path of MailScanner.  You
> will be punished.
>
> Jeff Earickson
> Colby College
Tell the name of your sin brother and then you may be absolved. Welcome 
back ;)