Performance between SpamAssassin 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 and 3.2.3
gmatt at nerc.ac.uk
Wed Aug 15 17:56:09 IST 2007
Daniel Eiland wrote:
> I am also seeing a dramatic performance decrease.
> My mailserver does around 30k emails a day, no problem with my previous
> spamassassin install, but after upgrading to 3.2.3 my queue is always around
> 1000 e-mails and emails are scanned with a delay of around 2 hours.
> The strange thing is my system is 70-90% idle, so a DNS problem sounds very
> likely to me.
given the relatively low traffic on this thread and my own inability to
spot the performance issue (even tho my upgrade to 3.2.2 happened pretty
recently) suggests that most people (myself included) have hidden the
problem behind a caching DNS server. Can anyone on this thread confirm
whether or not they are using a caching DNS?
I've attached a png from one of my relays showing spam check speed. The
upgrade happened right at the end of July on this box (more or less
where you see the red line). There is no noticeable drop in performance.
The dark blue line shows the spam check speed and the average for those
weeks is 89.5kB/s the magenta line is the max spam check speed. Note
that this is SA only. Virus checks and the like make the overall figures
barely register at the bottom of the graph!
This is a (~5 years) old dual Xeon currently pushing around 20-25k
message per day.
> In my maillog I log the speed, I get around 300 bytes per second! That's
> terribly slow. With a similar server, but with 3.2.1i get 45000 bytes per
> There must be something seriously wrong I think.
> I tried disabling plugins, but no significant difference.
> I hope someone has a solution for this.
have you tried installing a caching DNS?
Greg Matthews 01491 692445
Head of UNIX/Linux, iTSS Wallingford
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3903 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20070815/9aa3ef94/month.png
More information about the MailScanner