Performance between SpamAssassin 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 and 3.2.3

[Randal, Phil]

Running spamassassin -D -t <quarantined file name> reveals a lot.

I'm running SA with the patch from

  http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5589

and the debug output made that one pretty obvious.

Cheers,

Phil

--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info 
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf 
> Of Leland J. Steinke
> Sent: 14 August 2007 21:18
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Performance between SpamAssassin 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 
> and 3.2.3
> 
> Randal, Phil wrote:
> > I'm getting very slow DNS lookups from 
> combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com.
> > 
> > That might be a factor.
> > 
> > Does using 
> > 
> > score __RCVD_IN_WHOIS 0
> > score RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID 0
> > score URIBL_COMPLETEWHOIS 0
> > 
> > solve the performance problem?
> 
> Much to my recent regret, I have avoided subscribing to any 
> spamassassin 
> support lists, opting instead to let all of you more 
> adventurous types 
> work out the bugs while I just implement what is recommended 
> on the MS 
> list.  Would information such as the above be on the SA users 
> list?  Is 
> there a FAQ with known "gotchas" with running SA (3.2.2 in our case), 
> where this is listed?  How in Perdition do you track that 
> "combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com." is slow?
> 
> And it's only Tuesday!
> 
> 
> thanks,
> Leland
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 
>