AW: AW: DSN and 4.62.9 problem
r.berber at computer.org
Tue Aug 7 22:59:59 IST 2007
R. Ehle wrote:
> I partly agree with you. We have to distinguish "Read Notifications" from
> "Delivery Notifications".
Yes, I see that the read receipt messages have a MIME part with:
Reporting-UA: user; Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Final-Recipient: rfc822;user at whatever.com
Disposition: manual-action/MDN-sent-manually; displayed
So the precise term would be MDN (ref: RFC 2298) not DSN (ref: RFC 1891, 1892,
1894). My mistake on the subject.
> Delivery Notifications are sent by the MTA. If the delivery notification is
> sent by a MTA like sendmail, postfix or qmail, the Watermarking function
> works fine.
> If the Delivery Notification is sent by a Microsoft Exchange Server,
> especially, if it is the new one (Exchange 2007), then the header of the
> original message is not included and so Watermarking function fails to
> recognize the message.
Thanks for the clarification.
More information about the MailScanner