Upgrade to clamav 0.90.2 makes scanning extremely slow
Ed Bruce
edwardbruce at sbcglobal.net
Tue Apr 24 17:22:01 IST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Julian Field wrote:
>
>
> Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Martin wrote:
>
>>> Arto wrote:
>>>
>>>> We had this too. Uninstalling clamav* and installing it again helped.
>>>>
>>>> -arto
>>>>
>>> Thanks for all replies. Read about this issue on the clamav-list and
>>> hopefully it will be fixed in the next version.
>> I have similar problems with clamav myself.
>
>> What I did that improved a little bit
>> was deleting the virus database in /var/lib/clamav/*
>> and running freshclam again.
>
>> Still is very slow. If you try clamscan -debug you will
>> find out why it is so damn slow....
>
>> Clamd works fast on the other hand.
>> Maybe it should be included officialy (clamdscan)
>> in MailScanner's the next version.
> Why? I already support the "clamavmodule" which is faster than clamd anyway.
>
> Jules
>
And I haven't noticed any performance degradation with clamavmodule
since upgrading to 0.90.2.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGLi6ppdNaP9x3McgRAgJvAJ94r/PBKB+GzCkH3yaQTwAXPYi2FgCghN7y
ZvuZ77JK93k/71xB4gKxCOM=
=jGLv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list