Only a few incoming emails seem to be getting scanned. {Scanned}

[Glenn Steen]

On 29/09/06, Henry Hollenberg <hgh at rcwm.com> wrote:
> Glenn Steen wrote:
> > On 29/09/06, Henry Hollenberg <hgh at rcwm.com> wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> >> > Have you checked that all the appropriate stuff in postfix has been
> >> done...
> >> >
> >>
> >> Ooops!, you were right.  I skipped the postfix steps somehow....
> >> I've done them and restarted postfix and mailscanner.....now let's
> >> see how it goes....
> >
> >
> > Ah, that explains it.
> >
> >> FYI, don't test your boomerang email messages against a MTA that's
> >> already set
> >> up with MailScanner, it's easy to confuse their MailScanner entries
> >> for your own...
> >
> >
> > Not quite true. If you set your organization details correctly there
> > should be no problem whatsoever;-).
>
> For a clever lad such as yourself, I'm sure that's true.  For one that
> has to see at least one concrete example...ie see the thing in operation
> to understand how the org-names are used....apparently not.
>
> I did see the other orgs name in the headers and recall thinking to
> myself, hmmmmm, the mailscanner folks just happen to use the same
> acronym as we do at work, what a coincidence.  Something about forests,
> trees or snow and blind, not sure which, just  didn't click for some reason.

LOL, Don't beat yourself up about it, we all have our über-dense
moments... It being friday afternoon here, I'll shortly be tipping a
beer... I suggest you do the same:-).

> Thankyou for the tip, it did eventually sink thru my very, very dense skull.

Cheers
-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se