Spamcop.net RBL blocking emails by mistake?
Jon Radel
jon at radel.com
Sat Sep 9 05:05:01 IST 2006
James L. Day wrote:
> Excuse me, but why would a secret e-mail address at a spamtrap send a
> message to an auto-responder? It wouldn't be secret for very long if it
> were sending out e-mail messages...
1) Wrong question. More useful question: Why would somebody, say a
spammer, use an address other than one of their own, say a spamtrap
address found on their mailing list, as the purported source of e-mail?
Answer: Left as an exercise for the reader.
2) Flawed premise. Spamtrap addresses are much more useful if they are
*not* secret. You just take care to publish them in places from which
spammers harvest addresses, but in a fashion that makes clear to any
reasonably mindful human that stumbles across it that this address is
best not used for real correspondence. A secret spamtrap address would
be of some use against dictionary address generation, but in general you
*want* your spamtrap addresses to be on the spammers lists.
--Jon Radel
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list