Forbidden to browse http://www.mailscanner.info/files/4 - why?

[Glenn Steen]

On 06/09/06, sandrews at andrewscompanies.com
<sandrews at andrewscompanies.com> wrote:
> If it doesn't have a webfolder command, write one.  Come on, this is
> open source, help a brotha' out.

Um, what's wrong with mod_dav? http://www.akadia.com/services/mod_dav.html
... and the plethora of dav clients (inc. davfs ...:-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Res
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:54 PM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: RE: Forbidden to browse http://www.mailscanner.info/files/4 -
> why?
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Logan Shaw wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Res wrote:
> >> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, sandrews at andrewscompanies.com wrote:
> >
> >>> Most people don't allow file browse in webfolders.  I think it's
> >>> time to take your tinfoil hat off.
> >
> >> a webfolder... must be a micro$oft thing :P
> >>
> >> perl -pi -e "s/webfolder/directory (use its real name not M\$
> >> slang)/g;" *
> >
> > Nah, it's not Microsoft slang, because it makes logical sense.
>
> funny i only ever hear windows users refer to them as folders, for as
> long as I can remember, no linux or unix  has ever had a webfolder
> command :) in fact im buggered if i can find that term used anywhere on
> my machines, except when sifting through the /home/res/mail/mailscanner
> & sent-mail files, whats even more funny its not in apache ;)
>
> > If it were Microsoft slang, it would use terminology in a way that
> > muddies the issue and make everyone more confused than before.  Maybe
> > something which shows that Microsoft
>
> it does tho i think, thats why they call it webfolder instead of folder
> hehehe
>
> --
>
> Cheers
> Res


-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se