RBL List selection

[Alvaro Marín]

Hello,

>> Now, reviewing this, I've in MTA sbl.spamhaus.org but I've a few
>> messages with RCVD_IN_SBL (not scored to 0 in spam.assassin.prefs.conf):
>>
>> Oct 27 09:40:18 relay MailScanner[9474]: Message 6F6916E16C3.98A09 from
>> 83.11.59.37 (bdtelepolissro at telepolis.com) to xxxxxx.com is spam,
>> SpamAssassin (no almacenado, puntaje=31.359, requerido 6, BAYES_99 2.00,
>> FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50,
>> RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CHECK 4.00, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL
>> 1.95, RCVD_IN_SBL 3.16, RELAYCOUNTRY_ES -0.20, URIBL_AB_SURBL 3.81,
>> URIBL_BLACK 3.00, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.00, URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.01,
>> URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.50)
>>
>> As I've said, RCVD_IN_SBL only appears on 9 messages...and the IPs are
>> not listed:
>>
>> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=83.11.59.37
> 
> What about all the other IPs in the message?
> 
> SA checks them all.

SpamAssassin cache hit for message 07F1A7F913F.85C59
SpamAssassin cache hit for message 72D5C7F918D.93608
SpamAssassin cache hit for message 607FC7F88C4.71A6F

As I see those messages are cached by the SA cache; perhaps IPs were
listed but now they've been removed from the black list.

Regards,

-- 
Alvaro Marín Illera
Hostalia Internet
www.hostalia.com