MS 4.55.9 not detecting Mail::ClamAV

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Sat Oct 28 16:39:29 IST 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Res wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, TCIS List Acct wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Martin Hepworth wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> just run the normal clamav scanner from MAilScanner.conf - there's 
>>> little if any difference in performance.
>>>
>>
>> I thought the point of the Perl ClamAV module was increased performance?
>>
>> When I run the normal clamav scanner, the clamscan processes chew up 
>> too much CPU and take too long to scan the mail as compared to f-prot 
>> on the same box.
>>
>
> I found this problem also when doing hundreds of messages per batch, 
> so stopped using it and moved to f-prot and problem gone, the cost of 
> f-prot is well worth it.
I personally wouldn't recommend hundreds of messages per batch, the 
process sizes will get enormous. I would recommend clamavmodule as it 
avoids the startup cost of running the binary.
>
>

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

MailScanner customisation, or any advanced system administration help?
Contact me at Jules at Jules.FM

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.0 (Build 1112)
Comment: Fetch my public key foot-print from www.mailscanner.info
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFFQ3oGEfZZRxQVtlQRArEJAKDHSiPcGfda//EP7VBKechEfZnAQQCeIL2u
6RTe+T7KhTRFYQYAuTuZAoc=
=Nvg6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
For all your IT requirements visit www.transtec.co.uk



More information about the MailScanner mailing list