OT: MS Exchange Alternatives

[Peter Peters]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Steve Mason (maillist) wrote on 24-10-2006 5:12:
> I haven't really looked for a couple of years, but I've gotten quite
> used to Exchange, it's not so bad :) At my  main job we have Exchange
> 2003, and I don't have many complaints about it.

We have had some outstanding issues with Microsoft with this.

First of all Exchange/Outlook seems to discard all X-MailScanner-* (and
perhaps others) headers when a message is forwarded as an attachment.
This has happened a few times but probably in some freak situation with
MIME-headers, RTF etc combined.

The other was the fact Exchange changes the body of NDR's in such a way
the user can't trust the information he gets. Students were used to get
the correct information about which server did not accept the message
and why. Exchange changes that information (leaving out the server that
gives the error).

- --
Peter Peters, senior beheerder (Security)
Dienst Informatietechnologie, Bibliotheek en Educatie (ITBE)
Universiteit Twente,  Postbus 217,  7500 AE  Enschede
telefoon: 053 - 489 2301, fax: 053 - 489 2383, http://www.utwente.nl/itbe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFPgYOelLo80lrIdIRAt+jAKCMeYi+nRWMc8Sz0zOJT600Czxv5ACgiuKa
VAKcZy/IqiE6CTD/PQAwTbQ=
=wrpd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----