Anyone using FuzzyOCR?

[Chris Sweeney]

The only reason I haven't tried Imageinfo is, if I understand how it
works it seems it would cause alot of false positives if you have people
sending pictures in the email.  People sharing pictures might not like
this.  I would really like to find a good fix as the amount of image
SPAM getting in now, its getting very bad.


Julian Field wrote:
> I have spoken to other people who have tried FuzzyOCR and have found
> Imageinfo much more useful. FuzzyOCR is reckoned to be very high on
> resources and very slow, of the order of several seconds per message.
> The opinion from other people I have spoken to seems to be that it is
> not worth it.
>
> But that's my opinion, Gary.... (along with Steve Freegard of MailWatch
> fame and Anthony of milter.org fame).
>
> Pentland G. wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I'm trialling FuzzyOCR and having mixed results.
> >>
> >> Are any of you using this and what have you found?  Good and bad, I'm
> >> interested.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >>   
>
> Jules
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5188 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20061015/32c7680e/smime.bin