URIBL not as effective as it was
Paul Welsh
paul at welshfamily.com
Fri Oct 13 00:44:59 IST 2006
This time last year I could rely on the URIBL family of anti-spam measures
within spamassassin to detect loads of spam very reliably. Examples
include:
URIBL_SC_SURBL
URIBL_AB_SURBL
URIBL_WS_SURBL
URIBL_SBL
URIBL_OB_SURBL
URIBL_WS_SURBL
Seems to me these are far less effective than they were (they aren't showing
up as much). Can anyone confirm this from their own experince?
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list