OT: Spamcop BL - good or dangerous?
arturs at netvision.net.il
Wed Nov 29 20:42:07 GMT 2006
> I need more sleep. I though he was complaining about his inability to
> send. If he wants to post the entire bounce message or whatever, the
> addresses used, etc. I might like to look into it. Other than that, it
> is just a waste of time.
> BTW, I subscribe to httpd.apache.org and they are not being
> At least I have not seen any evidence of it.
Sorry, Gerard, deleted the original message, so no headers here...
Anyway, I include a part of the bounce message which gives some details:
> > > > Return-Path: <>
> > > > Received: (qmail 32717 invoked for bounce); 17 Nov 2006
> > > 00:41:45 -0000
> > > > Date: 17 Nov 2006 00:41:45 -0000
> > > > From: MAILER-DAEMON at apache.org
> > > > To: users-return-50756- at spamassassin.apache.org
> > > > Subject: failure notice
> > > >
> > > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
> > > > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the
> > > following addresses.
> > > > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it
> didn't work out.
> > > >
> > > > <list at cpt.co.il>:
> > > > 220.127.116.11 does not like recipient.
> > > > Remote host said: 553 5.3.0 <list at cpt.co.il>... Spam
> blocked see:
> > > > http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?18.104.22.168
> > > > Giving up on 22.214.171.124.
Thanks all for your time!
More information about the MailScanner