OT: Spamcop BL - good or dangerous?

[Arthur Sherman]

> I need more sleep. I though he was complaining about his inability to
> send. If he wants to post the entire bounce message or whatever, the
> addresses used, etc. I might like to look into it. Other than that, it
> is just a waste of time.
> 
> BTW, I subscribe to httpd.apache.org and they are not being 
> blacklisted.
> At least I have not seen any evidence of it.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Gerard


Sorry, Gerard, deleted the original message, so no headers here...

Anyway, I include a part of the bounce message which gives some details:
---
> > > > Return-Path: <>
> > > > Received: (qmail 32717 invoked for bounce); 17 Nov 2006 
> > > 00:41:45 -0000
> > > > Date: 17 Nov 2006 00:41:45 -0000
> > > > From: MAILER-DAEMON at apache.org
> > > > To: users-return-50756- at spamassassin.apache.org
> > > > Subject: failure notice
> > > > 
> > > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
> > > > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the 
> > > following addresses.
> > > > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it 
> didn't work out.
> > > > 
> > > > <list at cpt.co.il>:
> > > > 212.179.113.183 does not like recipient.
> > > > Remote host said: 553 5.3.0 <list at cpt.co.il>... Spam 
> blocked see:
> > > > http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?140.211.11.2
> > > > Giving up on 212.179.113.183.
---

Thanks all for your time!


Best,

--
Arthur Sherman

+972-52-4878851
CPTeam