use spamcop and bounce with spamcop response help.

[Chuck Rock]

Scott Silva <ssilva <at> sgvwater.com> writes:

> 
> Chuck Rock spake the following on 11/26/2006 4:41 PM:
> > I am bouncing messages with MailScanner that match the Spamcop list.
> > 
> > I see in the latest version I'm using 4.56.8 you can modify message 
headers 
> > with actions.
> > 
> > Is there a way to modify the message header to the spamcop address is 
listed 
> > with the proper IP like if you just used Sendmail to bounce it?
> > 
> > This is what Spamcop tells you to di if you run Sendmail.
> > 
> > FEATURE(`enhdnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `"Spam blocked see: 
> > http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?"$&{client_addr}', `t')dnl 
> > 
> > I was thinking of adding the message header in MailScanner similar to this.
> > 
> > Spam Actions = bounce header "X-Spam-Status: 
> > Yes : 'http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?'(flagged_IP)
> > 
> > Is there a syntax in Mailscanner to provide that IP to that header line so 
a 
> > person could get to the spamcop site with their IP address information?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Chuck
> > 
> If you want that "feature", and are dropping the message anyway, why not just
> drop it at the MTA. You will save yourself the load, and get the desired
> result. You really should never bounce messages after you receive them. If
> they are dropped during the connection phase, you get the rejection to the
> proper server, but if you have received it, then all you have is the possibly
> forged sender address to rely on.

So basically, if I can have MailScanner skip the spam lists check altogether 
and just put the spamcop config in the proper sendmail config file for my 
inbound sendmail process?

Is there another benefit of having MailScanner check the rbl's instead of or 
in addition to Sendmail?

Thanks,
Chuck