Mailscanner not catching SPAM but manual run via SA catches it

[Dan Carl]

 [snip]
>
> That's an option on MS, look for "Always Include SpamAssassin Report".
>
Thanks, missed it in the conf.
Now I can do some testing
 [snip]

I've been analyzing messages all morning.
It seems that spamassassin runs through all of the rules all the time but
mailscanner rules erratically.(example below)

FROM SPAMASSASSIN
Content analysis details:   (13.8 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------
--
 1.4 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
[SPF failed: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=sondraiszmcgrathly%40charter.net&ip=85.69.182.160&receiver=mail.bluestarshows.com]
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
 3.0 BAYES_95               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 95 to 99%
                            [score: 0.9598]
 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
                            [85.69.182.160 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see
<http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?85.69.182.160>]
 3.9 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
                            [85.69.182.160 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
 1.9 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL      RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
                            [85.69.182.160 listed in combined.njabl.org]

FROM MAILSCANNER
X-Bluestar-MScan-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=5.844,
 required 6, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 1.95, RCVD_IN_XBL 3.90,
 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.00)
X-Bluestar-SpamScore: sssss

This is the exact same message.
Why didn't Mailscanner use Bayes, SORBS or SPAMCOP?

It's not like there not working here's proof of one caught a few minutes
ago.
spamcop is not here but bayes and sorbs are.

X-Bluestar-MScan-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=9.284,
 required 6, BAYES_60 1.00, DCC_CHECK 2.17, DIGEST_MULTIPLE 0.77,
 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID 1.39, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.50,
 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 1.50, RAZOR2_CHECK 0.50,
 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB 1.46)

Rene hope you or someone else can help.