Mailscanner not catching SPAM but manual run via SA catches it
r.berber at computer.org
Mon Nov 13 23:51:13 GMT 2006
Dan Carl wrote:
> Looks to me like there very close to one another.
> Do they have to be exact?
No, but one score is just the rounded (to one decimal) value, so they seem to be
> Both marked them as spam, good no problem.
> The problem I have is the the ones that get though MailScanner.
> They contain no information in the header.
That's an option on MS, look for "Always Include SpamAssassin Report".
> These are the same message.
> What gives? Me dog could tell this is SPAM.
> Its like Mailscanner changes the header but never scans the message
> Any ideas for me?
I would take a look at the mail log, was the message white listed? Perhaps it
used a fake address which causes MS to not scan it (check custom rules if you
> sorry for the length just trying a give detail infomation.
More information about the MailScanner