[sendmail] Skipping rbl per domain

[Martin Hepworth]

Joost Waversveld wrote:
> Scott,
> 
> This is exactly what I was looking for, great!
> 
> I also looked at the solution of Steven Freegard, but that solution 
> needs an extra milter. This solution is 'standard' available in sendmail.
> 
> I think we are going to integrate this in our systems....
> 
> Thanks again!!
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Joost Waversveld
> 
> 
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> Joost Waversveld spake the following on 11/9/2006 8:50 AM:
>>> Hi to all,
>>>
>>> I've searched but I could not find an good answer...
>>>
>>> We have some mailscanners with a lot of domains pointing to them, which
>>> are very busy. At the moment we do not use RBL's through sendmail. We
>>> let Mailscanner (SpamAssassin) handle those lookups. This way every end
>>> user can choose what to do with the SPAM.
>>>
>>> To handle the load better we want to enable some RBL-checks through
>>> sendmail but we know some customers don't want that, because then we are
>>> deciding which mail could be deleted, and which not. If you get what I
>>> mean.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to enable the RBL-checks in sendmail per domain, so
>>> customer1 can use the function(s), but customer2 does not??
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Joost Waversveld
>> This might do what you want with some experimentation;
>> http://www.technoids.org/spamlovers.html
>>
>>
Joost

I'd look at  milter-ahead or sender-verification 
(http://smfs.sourceforge.net/smf-sav.html, which can also so recipient 
verification) so reduce your load too.

i drop over 66% of my inbound traffic this way.

-- 
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.	

**********************************************************************