mailscanner-mrtg graph labels
Gerry Doris
gdoris at rogers.com
Wed Nov 8 23:44:28 GMT 2006
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Denis Beauchemin wrote:
> Gerry Doris a écrit :
>> I upgraded my system from Fedora Core 4 to 6 last weekend. Surprisingly it
>> went quite well. I thought everything was working properly until I noticed
>> that two of the mailscanner-mrtg graphs have their labels messed up. The
>> data looks correct.
>>
>> The two messed up graphs are Mail Transferred and Memory. It is the top
>> level as well as the detail graphs. The vertical legend for each is
>> showing the number scale followed by the letters M,G,T,P spread out into
>> the graph area for each number.
>>
>> This has been working perfectly for ages...I think? Has anyone else
>> noticed this? I'm using 0.10.00. I upgraded to the unstable version 11
>> but it didn't make a difference.
> Gerry,
>
> This looks more like an MRTG problem than a MailScanner-MRTG one because the
> 2 graphs that you are having problems with come from different sources: your
> log files for MTA and SNMP for memory.
>
> Are you sure you didn't mess up the /etc/mrtg/mailscanner-mrtg.cfg file for
> these 2 graphs? This is what I have for the MTA:
> YLegend[mailbytes]: Bytes
> ShortLegend[mailbytes]: bytes
> Legend1[mailbytes]: Average Bytes
> Legend2[mailbytes]:
> Legend3[mailbytes]: Maximum Bytes
> Legend4[mailbytes]:
> LegendI[mailbytes]: :
> LegendO[mailbytes]:
> kilo[mailbytes]: 1024
> kMG[mailbytes]: k,M,G,T,P
>
> If all is OK, then maybe something changed in FC6 and the last 2 lines (kilo
> and kMG) are not having the same effect as they did before.
>
> Denis
I think something changed in FC6. My config file matches yours.
--
Gerry
"The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne" Chaucer
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list