Enough - MailScanner is responsible for SWAP usage!

[Julian Field]

Matt, and Michael, thankyou for your most recent posts.

As root, I hereby declare this thread dead.

All further postings on this subject will be ignored by everyone.  
Reply and you might consider yourself to have committed suicide as to  
your membership here.

I don't want to see anything like this happening here.

Now let us all go back to being the nice, friendly, helpful people  
that we are. Let us try to help out not only with direct MailScanner  
questions, but with the *occasional* off-topic request about the  
analysis of system performance and other such topics which are beyond  
the skills of the many hobbyist sysadmins that we have here.

Though I hate to say it, Have A *Nice* Day!!

Thankyou for listening.

On 22 May 2006, at 09:38, Michael S. wrote:

> I agree Matt, it's the best post I'v seen all day.
>
> I will not be replying to any further flames on the subject.
>
> Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Matt
> Hampton
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 3:58 AM
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: MailScanner is responsible for SWAP usage!
>
> Michael S. wrote:
>> Koopman, why don't you follow the thread and note my original  
>> message was
>> quite cordial. It's the snotty remarks from Kai that started it.  
>> Notice
> how
>> he has shut up since? I merely suggested that MS was swapping on  
>> my box.
>> Then I got a bunch of nasty, snotty replies. Defend MS all the  
>> way, but
>> there is no need to be rude about it.
>
> Guys
>
> Please take this in good nature this is intended.
>
> It's Monday - start of the week. Same Sh*t different week.
>
> This is friendly and well supported board and the degree to which this
> thread has flared up is normally restricted to the Postfix/MailScanner
> "debates"! ;-)
>
> Micheal: The Thread title was a poor choice without some evidence to
> back it up. As stated all processes could cause swapping to occur  
> so you
> need to examine whether this is actually causing a performance issue.
>
> Everyone else:  You know where the delete button is.  It's not  
> worth the
> raised eyebrows/blood pressure to get this worked up.
>
> Let's all go and get our choice of "get me through the day"  
> beverage and
>   carry on using (and abusing) MailScanner and trying to support our
> wonderful users.
>
> matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.