SA Scoring

uxbod at splatnix.net uxbod at splatnix.net
Tue May 16 16:07:35 IST 2006


Running with these already. As there is only two mailbox users then perhaps
it is down to the number of spam/ham learnt in Bayes.

On 1:30 pm 05/16/06 "Randal, Phil" <prandal at herefordshire.gov.uk> wrote:
> With Razor, Pyzor, DCC, and URIBLs (uribl.com blacklist) they get well
> clobbered here.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
>
> ----
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >  From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> >  [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf
> >  Of uxbod at splatnix.net
> >  Sent: 16 May 2006 15:00
> >  To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> >  Subject: SA Scoring
> >
> >  Hi,
> >
> >  i am trying to understand why I cannot get a particular spam
> >  email to be
> >  recognised.  Here is what I see in MailWatch :-
> >
> >  From: newberniste at g9.com [Add to Whitelist | Add to Blacklist]
> >
> >  To: xxxxxx at xxxxxx.com
> >  Subject: Re: your VALthUM
> >  Size: 4.4Kb
> >  Anti-Virus/Dangerous Content Protection
> >  Virus:  N
> >  Blocked File:  N
> >  Other Infection:  N
> >  SpamAssassin
> >  Spam:  N   Action(s): deliver, header, "X-Spam-Status:, No"
> >  High Scoring Spam:  N
> >  SpamAssassin Spam:  N
> >  Listed in RBL:  N
> >  Spam Whitelisted:  N
> >  Spam Blacklisted:  N
> >  SpamAssassin Autolearn:  Y  (not spam)
> >  SpamAssassin Score: 0.00
> >  Spam Report: Score Matching Rule Description
> >  cached not
> >   score=0.001
> >  6 required
> >  spam autolearn=not
> >  0.00 HTML_MESSAGE HTML included in message
> >
> >  I get a lot of these and the only thing that changes is the
> >  Subject line,
> >  but only by case modification.
> >
> >  When I get these I train using sa-learn, but after reading
> >  this will only
> >  happen if a minumum of three criteria are met.
> >
> >  How are you all handling messages like this ?
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >
> >  --
> >  This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> >  content by MailScanner, and is
> >  believed to be clean.
> >
> >  --
> >  MailScanner mailing list
> >  mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> >  http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> >
> >  Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> >
> >  Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> >
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list