SA Scoring
Randal, Phil
prandal at herefordshire.gov.uk
Tue May 16 14:30:02 IST 2006
With Razor, Pyzor, DCC, and URIBLs (uribl.com blacklist) they get well
clobbered here.
Cheers,
Phil
----
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf
> Of uxbod at splatnix.net
> Sent: 16 May 2006 15:00
> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Subject: SA Scoring
>
> Hi,
>
> i am trying to understand why I cannot get a particular spam
> email to be
> recognised. Here is what I see in MailWatch :-
>
> From: newberniste at g9.com [Add to Whitelist | Add to Blacklist]
>
> To: xxxxxx at xxxxxx.com
> Subject: Re: your VALthUM
> Size: 4.4Kb
> Anti-Virus/Dangerous Content Protection
> Virus: N
> Blocked File: N
> Other Infection: N
> SpamAssassin
> Spam: N Action(s): deliver, header, "X-Spam-Status:, No"
> High Scoring Spam: N
> SpamAssassin Spam: N
> Listed in RBL: N
> Spam Whitelisted: N
> Spam Blacklisted: N
> SpamAssassin Autolearn: Y (not spam)
> SpamAssassin Score: 0.00
> Spam Report: Score Matching Rule Description
> cached not
> score=0.001
> 6 required
> spam autolearn=not
> 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE HTML included in message
>
> I get a lot of these and the only thing that changes is the
> Subject line,
> but only by case modification.
>
> When I get these I train using sa-learn, but after reading
> this will only
> happen if a minumum of three criteria are met.
>
> How are you all handling messages like this ?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
> content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list