[Fwd: do you want to invest money ?] - MailScanner did notdetect?

[Billy A. Pumphrey]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-
> bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Martin Hepworth
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 3:13 AM
> To: 'MailScanner discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Fwd: do you want to invest money ?] - MailScanner did
> notdetect?
> 
> Jose
> 
> Works fine for me - here's the spamassassin rules that hit..
> 
> Content analysis details:   (65.3 points, 5.0 required)
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> -0.0 NO_RELAYS              Informational: message was not relayed via
> SMTP
>  2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP         Missing blank line between message header
and
> body
>  2.3 MANGLED_FREE           BODY: mangled free
>  2.3 MANGLED_LIST           BODY: mangled list
>  2.3 MANGLED_OFF            BODY: mangled off
>  2.3 MANGLED_DOMAIN         BODY: mangled domain
>  1.0 SARE_OBFUMONEY2        BODY: masked spam word(s)
>  2.3 MANGLED_FORM           BODY: mangled form
>  2.3 MANGLED_FROM           BODY: mangled from
>  2.3 MANGLED_VISIT          BODY: mangled visit
>  2.3 MANGLED_ACCNT          BODY: mangled account(s)
>  2.3 MANGLED_TEXT           BODY: mangled text
>  2.3 MANGLED_LOOK           BODY: mangled look(s)
>  2.3 MANGLED_WANT           BODY: mangled want
>  2.3 MANGLED_SPAM           BODY: mangled spam
>  2.3 MANGLED_PRIOR          BODY: mangled prior
>  2.3 MANGLED_PLEASE         BODY: mangled please
>  2.3 MANGLED_TRNFER         BODY: mangled TRANSFER
>  2.3 MANGLED_LOW            BODY: mangled low
>  2.3 MANGLED_MONEY          BODY: mangled money
>  2.3 MANGLED_TOOL           BODY: mangled tool
>  5.4 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to
100%
>                             [score: 0.9991]
>  0.5 SARE_HTML_MLINE_HTTP   RAW: MULTI-line http
>  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
>  1.7 SARE_OBFU_VISIT2       found apparent obfuscation of word used in
> spam
>  5.8 BODY_OBFU_WINDOWS      Attempt to obfuscated the word 'windows'
>  1.0 UOLCC_DOWN             Drugs downwards
>  0.1 TO_CC_NONE             No To: or Cc: header
>  2.5 FM_NO_FROM_OR_TO       FM_NO_FROM_OR_TO
> -0.0 NO_RECEIVED            Informational: message has no Received
headers
>  0.5 FM_NO_TO               FM_NO_TO
>  1.1 FM_MULTI_ODD2          FM_MULTI_ODD2
> 
> You'll find the MANGLED rules in
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm/mangled.cf
> 
> There's loads of other useful SA rules at that site too..
> 

How did your bayes say 99-100 when mine says 0-1%?

Here is my "Bayes Database Information" from mailwatch:
Bayes Database Information 
Number of Spam Messages: 82,819 
Number of Ham Messages: 299,200 
Number of Tokens: 137,758 
Oldest Token: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:30:39 -0500 
Newest Token: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 04:13:57 -0500 
Last Journal Sync: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:26:27 -0500 
Last Expiry: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:10:48 -0500 
Last Expiry Reduction Count: 13,718 tokens